zero diffusion/exhange barrier for an insolvable atom
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:29 pm
Hi folks,
If a foreign atom cannot dissolve into host lattice, can I still employ NEB to calculate on diffusion barrier?
I am calculating Y-Vac pair in a bcc lattice. The Y-Vac pair are originally sitting by 1/2[111] distance in the large bcc supercell before relaxation. To be more specific, in the starting image, before relaxation, the vacancy is originally at a corner site, 000, and the Y at the cubic center 0.5,0.5,0.5. After relaxation, the Y atom finally sits at about 2/3*1/2[111] distance from the corner 000. While in the ending image, before relaxation, the vacancy is at the cubic center and the atom at 000. After relaxation, the atom finally sits at about 1/3*1/2[111] distance from the corner 000. Therefore, the Y atoms are actually separated only by (1/3)*(SQRT(3)/2)*a = ~0.8 A in two end images. Consequently, for the following NEB calculation which I inserted evenly 4 intermediate images, I ended up with almost zero total energy variation among all images.
I have rechecked my calculations. I had a thought: this atom is a very large atom indeed. Furthermore it cannot really dissolve in Fe (the heat of solution is highly positive), so it can move a lot to vacancy in the bcc host during relaxation, making the atom-vacancy exchange barrier to be almost zero by NEB.
Any comments/suggestion regarding this? Many Thanks.
If a foreign atom cannot dissolve into host lattice, can I still employ NEB to calculate on diffusion barrier?
I am calculating Y-Vac pair in a bcc lattice. The Y-Vac pair are originally sitting by 1/2[111] distance in the large bcc supercell before relaxation. To be more specific, in the starting image, before relaxation, the vacancy is originally at a corner site, 000, and the Y at the cubic center 0.5,0.5,0.5. After relaxation, the Y atom finally sits at about 2/3*1/2[111] distance from the corner 000. While in the ending image, before relaxation, the vacancy is at the cubic center and the atom at 000. After relaxation, the atom finally sits at about 1/3*1/2[111] distance from the corner 000. Therefore, the Y atoms are actually separated only by (1/3)*(SQRT(3)/2)*a = ~0.8 A in two end images. Consequently, for the following NEB calculation which I inserted evenly 4 intermediate images, I ended up with almost zero total energy variation among all images.
I have rechecked my calculations. I had a thought: this atom is a very large atom indeed. Furthermore it cannot really dissolve in Fe (the heat of solution is highly positive), so it can move a lot to vacancy in the bcc host during relaxation, making the atom-vacancy exchange barrier to be almost zero by NEB.
Any comments/suggestion regarding this? Many Thanks.