GSSNEB

Vasp transition state theory tools

Moderator: moderators

Post Reply
JXToronto
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 1:50 pm

GSSNEB

Post by JXToronto »

Hi all,

I am currently performing GSSNEB calculations in VASP 6.3.1. Upon achieving convergence, I have observed the presence of two local minima in energy along the migration path (please refer to the attached figure). Is this a reasonable result, or should we contemplate dividing the entire path into three segments and conducting separate GSSNEB calculations for each? Thank you very much.
I attach my INCAR file here.

SYSTEM = ABX3
LWAVE=.FALSE.
LCHARG=.FALSE.
ISTART=0
ICHARG=2
ALGO=Normal
PREC=Normal
LASPH=.TRUE.
LREAL= Auto
NPAR = 10
ISPIN=1
ISYM=0
ENCUT=400
ISMEAR=0
SIGMA=0.05
NELM=1000
NSW=200
POTIM=0
ISIF=3
IBRION=3
EDIFF=1E-5
EDIFFG=-0.05
ICHAIN = 0
SPRING = -5
LNEBCELL= .TRUE.
LCLIMB = .TRUE.
IMAGES = 25
IOPT=3
TIMESETP=0.01
SYMPREC = 1E-6
Last edited by JXToronto on Fri Nov 17, 2023 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
graeme
Site Admin
Posts: 2289
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 4:25 am
Contact:

Re: GSSNEB

Post by graeme »

This looks like a very nice path to me. If you want to improve your estimate of the minima and the 2 lower-energy saddles, then you can break up the path. But if you just want to know the three steps along the path and the overall barrier - it looks like you have that converged nicely.
JXToronto
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2023 1:50 pm

Re: GSSNEB

Post by JXToronto »

Thank you very much!
Post Reply