Dear Wenjie and graeme,
I saw the new bader code is available on the main page today. Thanks for updating the code.
I tried to use the new code in my system, and I found that the vacuum volume is very sensitive to the "vacuum_density " that I set. So I want to know is there any rules to set that ...
Search found 24 matches
- Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:23 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: How to set the "vacuum_density "
- Replies: 1
- Views: 61100
- Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:26 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Can the new DOS code deal with the slab model?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 90182
Re: Can the new DOS code deal with the slab model?
graeme wrote :
> Yes, it should work with slab models. It is advisable to use the -vac
> cutoff with the Bader analysis code to avoid assigning large vacuum regions
> (with many unoccupied states) to the surface atoms.
"-vac" option does not work in the lastest Bader code on the website.
> Yes, it should work with slab models. It is advisable to use the -vac
> cutoff with the Bader analysis code to avoid assigning large vacuum regions
> (with many unoccupied states) to the surface atoms.
"-vac" option does not work in the lastest Bader code on the website.
- Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:23 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: can bader script used for CHGCAR analyis of vasp 4.6.28
- Replies: 2
- Views: 75444
Re: can bader script used for CHGCAR analyis of vasp 4.6.28
The valence configuration of Ag should be 4d10 5s1, So why the number of Ag eletrons is about 16? I think it should be about 11.
- Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:51 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volumes
- Replies: 14
- Views: 342645
Re: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volu
Thanks, I am looking forward to the new Bader code.
- Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:19 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Can the new DOS code deal with the slab model?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 90182
Can the new DOS code deal with the slab model?
Dear Wenjie and Graeme,
Using the input file of the test example one the website, I can obtain the identical DOSCAR to the test one. But when I performed similar calculations on a slab model, the results seemed incorrect. The partial DOS of all the surface atoms should be identical (This is indeed ...
Using the input file of the test example one the website, I can obtain the identical DOSCAR to the test one. But when I performed similar calculations on a slab model, the results seemed incorrect. The partial DOS of all the surface atoms should be identical (This is indeed ...
- Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:14 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volumes
- Replies: 14
- Views: 342645
Re: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volu
Dear Dan,
Using the input file of the test example, I can also obtain the identical DOSCAR to the test one, when using NPAR = 1 and LORBIT = 10. But when I performed similar calculations on a slab model, the results seemed incorrect. The partial DOS of all the surface atoms should be identical ...
Using the input file of the test example, I can also obtain the identical DOSCAR to the test one, when using NPAR = 1 and LORBIT = 10. But when I performed similar calculations on a slab model, the results seemed incorrect. The partial DOS of all the surface atoms should be identical ...
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volumes
- Replies: 14
- Views: 342645
Re: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volu
Dear, Dan,
Does your problem figure out? I got similar problems to yours that the same atoms obtain different site-projected DOS.
Does your problem figure out? I got similar problems to yours that the same atoms obtain different site-projected DOS.
- Fri May 28, 2010 4:24 pm
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: dosrun_complete.tar.gz
- Replies: 3
- Views: 121186
Re: dosrun_complete.tar.gz
Ok,I find it.
Thanks, Dan
Thanks, Dan
- Fri May 28, 2010 7:22 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: dosrun_complete.tar.gz
- Replies: 3
- Views: 121186
dosrun_complete.tar.gz
Hi,
The download link for the Completed calculation example (dosrun_complete.tar.gz) on the website is useless.
would you please update that link so that I can download and compare my result with yours ?
Thanks.
The download link for the Completed calculation example (dosrun_complete.tar.gz) on the website is useless.
would you please update that link so that I can download and compare my result with yours ?
Thanks.
- Thu May 27, 2010 6:02 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Where is the new Bader code?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 87949
Re: Where is the new Bader code?
OK, I see. Thanks for your reply.
- Wed May 26, 2010 2:05 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Compling errors with bdrpro.f
- Replies: 2
- Views: 100686
Re: Compling errors with bdrpro.f
Hi, Wenjie,
Thanks very much for your reply. Now the compilation can be done with no errors but a few warnings, which are listed as follows.
/opt/mpich-gm/bin/mpif90 -Mfree -fast -tp k8-64 -c bdrpro.f
PGF90-W-0103-Type conversion of subscript expression for atomnum (bdrpro.f: 1262)
PGF90-W-0103 ...
Thanks very much for your reply. Now the compilation can be done with no errors but a few warnings, which are listed as follows.
/opt/mpich-gm/bin/mpif90 -Mfree -fast -tp k8-64 -c bdrpro.f
PGF90-W-0103-Type conversion of subscript expression for atomnum (bdrpro.f: 1262)
PGF90-W-0103 ...
- Tue May 25, 2010 3:07 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Compling errors with bdrpro.f
- Replies: 2
- Views: 100686
Compling errors with bdrpro.f
Hi,
I have downloaded the latest code on http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/dos/, and re-compied VASP exactly as the suggestions on the website.
However, there were always some similr errors occured while compling the bdrpro.f file. The error messages are as follows.
PGF90-S-0043-Illegal ...
I have downloaded the latest code on http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/dos/, and re-compied VASP exactly as the suggestions on the website.
However, there were always some similr errors occured while compling the bdrpro.f file. The error messages are as follows.
PGF90-S-0043-Illegal ...
- Mon May 24, 2010 2:50 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Where is the new Bader code?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 87949
Where is the new Bader code?
I saw that a new version of Bader code is updated in the "Version Information" topic. However, I cannot find it in the homepage. Is this code available now?
- Tue May 18, 2010 3:02 pm
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Compiling VASP with bdrpro.F
- Replies: 5
- Views: 188256
Re: Compiling VASP with bdrpro.F
Hi,
I also have some error messages during the compling process. The error messages are as follows,
PGF90-S-0043-Illegal attempt to redefine symbol lattice (bdrpro.f: 897)
PGF90-S-0044-Multiple declaration for symbol lattice (bdrpro.f: 897)
0 inform, 0 warnings, 2 severes, 0 fatal for read_charge ...
I also have some error messages during the compling process. The error messages are as follows,
PGF90-S-0043-Illegal attempt to redefine symbol lattice (bdrpro.f: 897)
PGF90-S-0044-Multiple declaration for symbol lattice (bdrpro.f: 897)
0 inform, 0 warnings, 2 severes, 0 fatal for read_charge ...
- Tue May 18, 2010 7:01 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Version Information
- Replies: 36
- Views: 892948
Re: Version Information
Where can I download the version 0.27? I cannot found it on the website http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/bader/