Search found 24 matches

by andyfan
Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:23 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: How to set the "vacuum_density "
Replies: 1
Views: 61100

How to set the "vacuum_density "

Dear Wenjie and graeme,

I saw the new bader code is available on the main page today. Thanks for updating the code.
I tried to use the new code in my system, and I found that the vacuum volume is very sensitive to the "vacuum_density " that I set. So I want to know is there any rules to set that ...
by andyfan
Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:26 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Can the new DOS code deal with the slab model?
Replies: 3
Views: 90182

Re: Can the new DOS code deal with the slab model?

graeme wrote :
> Yes, it should work with slab models. It is advisable to use the -vac
> cutoff with the Bader analysis code to avoid assigning large vacuum regions
> (with many unoccupied states) to the surface atoms.

"-vac" option does not work in the lastest Bader code on the website.
by andyfan
Tue Jun 29, 2010 8:23 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: can bader script used for CHGCAR analyis of vasp 4.6.28
Replies: 2
Views: 75444

Re: can bader script used for CHGCAR analyis of vasp 4.6.28

The valence configuration of Ag should be 4d10 5s1, So why the number of Ag eletrons is about 16? I think it should be about 11.
by andyfan
Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:51 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volumes
Replies: 14
Views: 342645

Re: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volu

Thanks, I am looking forward to the new Bader code.
by andyfan
Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:19 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Can the new DOS code deal with the slab model?
Replies: 3
Views: 90182

Can the new DOS code deal with the slab model?

Dear Wenjie and Graeme,

Using the input file of the test example one the website, I can obtain the identical DOSCAR to the test one. But when I performed similar calculations on a slab model, the results seemed incorrect. The partial DOS of all the surface atoms should be identical (This is indeed ...
by andyfan
Wed Jun 02, 2010 2:14 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volumes
Replies: 14
Views: 342645

Re: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volu

Dear Dan,

Using the input file of the test example, I can also obtain the identical DOSCAR to the test one, when using NPAR = 1 and LORBIT = 10. But when I performed similar calculations on a slab model, the results seemed incorrect. The partial DOS of all the surface atoms should be identical ...
by andyfan
Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:12 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volumes
Replies: 14
Views: 342645

Re: Strange results for the DOS projection in the Bader volu

Dear, Dan,

Does your problem figure out? I got similar problems to yours that the same atoms obtain different site-projected DOS.
by andyfan
Fri May 28, 2010 4:24 pm
Forum: Bader
Topic: dosrun_complete.tar.gz
Replies: 3
Views: 121186

Re: dosrun_complete.tar.gz

Ok,I find it.
Thanks, Dan
by andyfan
Fri May 28, 2010 7:22 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: dosrun_complete.tar.gz
Replies: 3
Views: 121186

dosrun_complete.tar.gz

Hi,
The download link for the Completed calculation example (dosrun_complete.tar.gz) on the website is useless.
would you please update that link so that I can download and compare my result with yours ?
Thanks.
by andyfan
Thu May 27, 2010 6:02 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Where is the new Bader code?
Replies: 2
Views: 87949

Re: Where is the new Bader code?

OK, I see. Thanks for your reply.
by andyfan
Wed May 26, 2010 2:05 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Compling errors with bdrpro.f
Replies: 2
Views: 100686

Re: Compling errors with bdrpro.f

Hi, Wenjie,
Thanks very much for your reply. Now the compilation can be done with no errors but a few warnings, which are listed as follows.

/opt/mpich-gm/bin/mpif90 -Mfree -fast -tp k8-64 -c bdrpro.f
PGF90-W-0103-Type conversion of subscript expression for atomnum (bdrpro.f: 1262)
PGF90-W-0103 ...
by andyfan
Tue May 25, 2010 3:07 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Compling errors with bdrpro.f
Replies: 2
Views: 100686

Compling errors with bdrpro.f

Hi,

I have downloaded the latest code on http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/dos/, and re-compied VASP exactly as the suggestions on the website.
However, there were always some similr errors occured while compling the bdrpro.f file. The error messages are as follows.

PGF90-S-0043-Illegal ...
by andyfan
Mon May 24, 2010 2:50 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Where is the new Bader code?
Replies: 2
Views: 87949

Where is the new Bader code?

I saw that a new version of Bader code is updated in the "Version Information" topic. However, I cannot find it in the homepage. Is this code available now?
by andyfan
Tue May 18, 2010 3:02 pm
Forum: Bader
Topic: Compiling VASP with bdrpro.F
Replies: 5
Views: 188256

Re: Compiling VASP with bdrpro.F

Hi,
I also have some error messages during the compling process. The error messages are as follows,

PGF90-S-0043-Illegal attempt to redefine symbol lattice (bdrpro.f: 897)
PGF90-S-0044-Multiple declaration for symbol lattice (bdrpro.f: 897)
0 inform, 0 warnings, 2 severes, 0 fatal for read_charge ...
by andyfan
Tue May 18, 2010 7:01 am
Forum: Bader
Topic: Version Information
Replies: 36
Views: 892948

Re: Version Information

Where can I download the version 0.27? I cannot found it on the website http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/bader/