Search found 6 matches
- Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:34 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29131
Re: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
Thanks very much! :)
- Tue Jan 10, 2012 3:27 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29131
Re: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
I tried running the calculation with ADDGRID = .FALSE. and both versions of the code give exactly the same numbers (see below). Note I have manually added the 2 columns on the end to calculate the charges:
# X Y Z CHARGE MIN DIST ATOMIC VOL ...
# X Y Z CHARGE MIN DIST ATOMIC VOL ...
- Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:10 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29131
Re: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
Here are the files. Thanks!
- Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:58 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29131
Re: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
The files you requested are attached.
Thanks.
Thanks.
- Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:35 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29131
Re: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
Thanks for the prompt reply!
Re the extra data in the ACF files- i.e. last 2 columns- I actually added this manually after the calculation finished. Apologies for the confusion!
I am happy for you to look at the CHGCAR files- should I upload them here? They are about 8.2MB each.
Re the extra data in the ACF files- i.e. last 2 columns- I actually added this manually after the calculation finished. Apologies for the confusion!
I am happy for you to look at the CHGCAR files- should I upload them here? They are about 8.2MB each.
- Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:45 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
- Replies: 10
- Views: 29131
Different charges using vasp 5.2.11 and vasp 5.2.12
I have just calculated the Bader charges for bulk SiC using VASP 5.2.11 and VASP 5.2.12 and I get different results (see below).
I used identical POSCAR, KPOINTS and INCAR files. I am using PAWs and I added LAECHG=.TRUE to the INCAR file and followed the instructions at http://theory.cm.utexas.edu ...
I used identical POSCAR, KPOINTS and INCAR files. I am using PAWs and I added LAECHG=.TRUE to the INCAR file and followed the instructions at http://theory.cm.utexas.edu ...