[quote="graeme"]There is a new instanton module which should be listed in your list of objects. See the instructions at:
http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/downloads/
to include instanton.o in your makefile[/quote]
Sorry, there is the instanton.o in the list of objects of my makefile. So, Is ...
Search found 7 matches
- Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:01 am
- Forum: VTSTTools
- Topic: VTST 2.x code updates
- Replies: 31
- Views: 947893
- Sun Feb 19, 2012 2:19 pm
- Forum: VTSTTools
- Topic: VTST 2.x code updates
- Replies: 31
- Views: 947893
problems with compiling VTSTcode v2.04 with VASP5.2
[quote="graeme"]Can you make sure that the new objects:
dimer.o dynmat.o neb.o lanczos.o sd.o cg.o qm.o lbfgs.o bfgs.o fire.o opt.o
are all listed before chain.o in the makefile. My guess is that they are after, so that chain.o is being built before opt.o, and it is complaining about not finding ...
dimer.o dynmat.o neb.o lanczos.o sd.o cg.o qm.o lbfgs.o bfgs.o fire.o opt.o
are all listed before chain.o in the makefile. My guess is that they are after, so that chain.o is being built before opt.o, and it is complaining about not finding ...
- Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:52 am
- Forum: VTSTTools
- Topic: optimization methods mentioned in your article
- Replies: 1
- Views: 56856
optimization methods mentioned in your article
Hi graeme,
I read your paper in 2008(the journal of chemical physics 128,134106) about optimizers. In that paper, it mentioned that GL-BFGS(hess) is faster than L-BFGS, but the qualitative error exists.
(1) Is that means that GL-BFGS(hess) is not stable and for some systems a big error may happen ...
I read your paper in 2008(the journal of chemical physics 128,134106) about optimizers. In that paper, it mentioned that GL-BFGS(hess) is faster than L-BFGS, but the qualitative error exists.
(1) Is that means that GL-BFGS(hess) is not stable and for some systems a big error may happen ...
- Thu Sep 29, 2011 12:14 pm
- Forum: VTSTTools
- Topic: New optimizer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 173684
Re: New optimizer
Hi graeme,
I read your paper in 2008 about optimizers. In that paper, it mentioned that GL-BFGS(hess) is faster than L-BFGS, but the qualitative error exists.
(1) Is that means that GL-BFGS(hess) is not stable and for some systems a big error may happen?
(2) Is IOPT=1 stands for GL_BFGS(hess ...
I read your paper in 2008 about optimizers. In that paper, it mentioned that GL-BFGS(hess) is faster than L-BFGS, but the qualitative error exists.
(1) Is that means that GL-BFGS(hess) is not stable and for some systems a big error may happen?
(2) Is IOPT=1 stands for GL_BFGS(hess ...
- Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:04 am
- Forum: VTSTTools
- Topic: New optimizer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 173684
Re: New optimizer
Hi graeme,
I'm so sorry for the silly mistake about "IPOT". As I have mentioned in the last message, because of the periodic boundary conditions, the boundary atoms A (x=0) and B (x=1) are the same atom. So, there is nothing to worry about its movement from one side of the box to the other side. Is ...
I'm so sorry for the silly mistake about "IPOT". As I have mentioned in the last message, because of the periodic boundary conditions, the boundary atoms A (x=0) and B (x=1) are the same atom. So, there is nothing to worry about its movement from one side of the box to the other side. Is ...
- Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:49 am
- Forum: VTSTTools
- Topic: New optimizer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 173684
Re: New optimizer
Hi graeme:
First, I did visualize my diffusion path, and there were no wierd atoms except that the boundary atoms. But, I think they are the same atoms, if A atom is in position of x=1 and B atom is in Position of x=0, and after the nebmake process, there is no atom of x=0.5 in the middle image. Is ...
First, I did visualize my diffusion path, and there were no wierd atoms except that the boundary atoms. But, I think they are the same atoms, if A atom is in position of x=1 and B atom is in Position of x=0, and after the nebmake process, there is no atom of x=0.5 in the middle image. Is ...
- Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:54 pm
- Forum: VTSTTools
- Topic: New optimizer
- Replies: 9
- Views: 173684
Re: New optimizer
Hi,
I'm learning to use the CINEB method and the VTSTTools for diffusion in bulk system. When using the new optimizers ,QM and FIRE, they didn't behave well and quickly converge (even for IMAGE = 1 and EDIFFG = -1eV/A). Is the default paramters for the optimizers the best? Or there are some tips ...
I'm learning to use the CINEB method and the VTSTTools for diffusion in bulk system. When using the new optimizers ,QM and FIRE, they didn't behave well and quickly converge (even for IMAGE = 1 and EDIFFG = -1eV/A). Is the default paramters for the optimizers the best? Or there are some tips ...