graeme wrote:
> The way that you have described how you are determining atomic spins looks
> correct to me.
>
> The atomic volumes should only depend upon the CHGCAR_sum file and not the
> CHGCAR_spin. Maybe double check the test where you found this was not the
> case. If you are pretty sure of ...
Search found 2 matches
- Wed Apr 26, 2023 1:35 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: About the atomic partitioning volume
- Replies: 3
- Views: 71401
- Tue Apr 25, 2023 5:21 am
- Forum: Bader
- Topic: About the atomic partitioning volume
- Replies: 3
- Views: 71401
About the atomic partitioning volume
Dear Baders,
I have now analyzed the atomic magnetic moment by Bader (version 1.04) analysis for VASP calculations. According to the website of Bader, I produce the core charge for the investigated system and get the CHGCAR_sum for the reference by
chgsum.pl AECCAR0 AECCAR2
Also, I have the spin ...
I have now analyzed the atomic magnetic moment by Bader (version 1.04) analysis for VASP calculations. According to the website of Bader, I produce the core charge for the investigated system and get the CHGCAR_sum for the reference by
chgsum.pl AECCAR0 AECCAR2
Also, I have the spin ...