Dear Sir
To calculate the dipole moment in each bader's volume, I uncommented the line "IF (opts%dipole_flag) CALL multipole()" in main.f90. Then I tried to compile the source code including the multipole_mode.f90 in the Makefile. I used ifort compiler for this. I could compile the code if I don't modify anything but with the above mentioned modification, it is giving the following error message.
gfortran -O2 -c multipole_mod.f90
multipole_mod.f90:32.22:
SUBROUTINE multipole()
1
Error: MODULE attribute of 'multipole' conflicts with PROCEDURE attribute at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:34.32:
REAL(q2),DIMENSION(3,3) :: B
1
Error: Unexpected data declaration statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:35.45:
REAL(q2),DIMENSION(3) :: dv,v,ringf,shift
1
Error: Unexpected data declaration statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:36.42:
INTEGER :: i,atom,nx,ny,nz,tenths_done
1
Error: Unexpected data declaration statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:37.33:
INTEGER :: cr,count_max,t1,t2
1
Error: Unexpected data declaration statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:38.26:
TYPE(ions_obj) :: ions
1
Error: Unexpected data declaration statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:40.38:
CALL SYSTEM_CLOCK(t1,cr,count_max)
1
Error: Unexpected CALL statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:42.52:
WRITE(*,'(/,2x,A)') 'CALCULATING DIPOLE MOMENTS'
1
Error: Unexpected WRITE statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:43.63:
WRITE(*,'(2x,A)') ' 0 10 25 50 75 100'
1
Error: Unexpected WRITE statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:44.43:
WRITE(*,'(2x,A,$)') 'PERCENT DONE: **'
1
Error: Unexpected WRITE statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:46.19:
ALLOCATE(dipole(ndim,3))
1
Error: Syntax error in ALLOCATE statement at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:47.12:
dipole=0
1
Error: Unexpected assignment statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:48.16:
shift=0.5_q2
1
Error: Unexpected assignment statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:49.26:
IF (vasp) shift=1.0_q2
1
Error: Unexpected simple IF statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:50.4:
ringf(1)=1.0_q2/REAL(nxf,q2)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:51.4:
ringf(2)=1.0_q2/REAL(nyf,q2)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:52.4:
ringf(3)=1.0_q2/REAL(nzf,q2)
1
Error: Unclassifiable statement at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:53.17:
tenths_done=0
1
Error: Unexpected assignment statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:54.15:
DO nx=1,nxf
1
Error: Unexpected DO statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:55.41:
IF ((nx*10/nxf) > tenths_done) THEN
1
Error: Unexpected block IF statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:56.31:
tenths_done=(nx*10/nxf)
1
Error: Unexpected assignment statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:57.29:
WRITE(*,'(A,$)') '**'
1
Error: Unexpected WRITE statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:58.9:
END IF
1
Error: Expecting END MODULE statement at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:59.17:
DO ny=1,nyf
1
Error: Unexpected DO statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
multipole_mod.f90:60.19:
DO nz=1,nzf
1
Error: Unexpected DO statement in CONTAINS section at (1)
Fatal Error: Error count reached limit of 25.
make: *** [multipole_mod.o] Error 1
As you can see that I could not compile the multipole_mod.f90 subroutine.
Kindly help me in compiling the code.
Best
Swarup
Compilation problem when multipole_mode.f90 is included
Moderator: moderators
Re: Compilation problem when multipole_mode.f90 is included
The multiple code has not been hooked up an tested in a long time. At this point,
we do not support the calculation of multiples in the Bader volumes.
we do not support the calculation of multiples in the Bader volumes.
Re: Compilation problem when multipole_mode.f90 is included
[quote="graeme"]The multiple code has not been hooked up an tested in a long time. At this point,
we do not support the calculation of multiples in the Bader volumes.[/quote]
Thanks for your reply. Is there any alternative way to calculate the dipole moment at each site now? If it is there, please let me know.
we do not support the calculation of multiples in the Bader volumes.[/quote]
Thanks for your reply. Is there any alternative way to calculate the dipole moment at each site now? If it is there, please let me know.